Evalueserve Circle of Experts
Contact Login    Login Apply Now    Refer an Expert Refer an Expert  Contact Contact us 
Subscribe
RSS/Atom Feeds
RSS/Atom Feeds
Add to My MSN
Add to My MSN
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Yahoo
Subscribe on NewsGator
Subscribe on NewsGator
Subscribe on Bloglines
Subscribe on Bloglines
Sign In
Email Address
Categories
Archives
<September 2010>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2930311234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293012
3456789
Venture Capital/Private Equity
A VC, Musings of a VC in NYC
Beyond VC
Burnham's Beat: Thoughts on software investing
BusinessWeek DealFlow
Dan Primack's Private Equity Week Wire
Due Diligence
Feld Thoughts
Jason Ball's Tech Bytes
Jeff Nolan
Josh Wolfe's Weblog
NWVentureVoice
Occam's Razor
Section One
TJ's Weblog
VC Ball
Venture Blog
VentureWiki
Private Equity Portfolio Operations
Public Markets Investing
Integrity Research Blog
The big picture
Tom Brown's Bankstocks.com
The Kirk Report, one pro's view of the stock market
The Capital Spectator
Seeking Alpha
Online Networks
Apophenia
Clay Shirky's Writings about the Internet
David Weinberger
How to Save the World
Keith Hampton
Life with Alacrity
Many-to-Many Blog
Mathemagenic
Networks, Complexity, and Relatedness
Raindrop
Ross Mayfield's Weblog
Smarter, Simpler, Social, Lee Bryant
Stowe Boyd
TechCrunch
Miscellaneous
The Privacy Marketing Review
Internet Time Group Blog
Internet Marketing and Sales Technology from the Trenches
John Robb
Profiles
Blogstreet Profile
Blogging Resources
NYC Bloggers Map
Productivity
43 Folders
Lifehacker
 
 
Brain Food Blog
Recent Entries
 
Sep. 22: Where are the Deals? Private Equity and Venture Capital Funds' Best Practices in Deal Origination
Lead Generation 2.0: How Entrepreneurs are Fueling the Next Wave of Innovation in Internet Marketing
Underleveraged talent pool: the unemployed and underemployed
Leveraging the talents of the autistic/creating a new business
Raising Fund X: Trends in Private Equity Fundraising and Fund Evaluation
Visit to SF Bay Area May 5-8: Wharton & Columbia Business School Alumni Clubs
Integrity Research Names Evalueserve Circle of Experts 2008 Top Pick as Asia/ Emerging Market Specialist Expert Network
On Sourcing Deals for Private Equity Funds
 
 Thursday, January 20, 2005
Getting Back To Work: A Personal Productivity Toolkit
You may like Getting Back To Work: A Personal Productivity Toolkit.

I have already reset my browser home page to the page mentioned in the excerpt below:

One major behavior that triggers a work interruption is "going online." The Internet is a vast repository of Time Wasters, and if you're like me, the activity that signals that I'm about to lose focus is opening the web browser. So I created a simple web page with the words "Get Back to Work" in big, bold letters on top and set it as my homepage.

In fact, I went one step further and decided to make this page a productivity tool. I type in what my next goal is, and a time I want it completed by. Then I can click one of three buttons:

* I completed this task on time
* I did not finish this task on time
* I didn't do any work

And the web page keeps a running tally (using cookies) of items I finished on time, items that took longer than the allotted time, and times I didn't do any work and just goofed off.

By keeping this open all day, not only does it remind me when I look at my web browser that I should get back to work, but it allows me to see at a glance how able I am to dedicate myself to reaching goals, whether or not I reached them (whether it was my fault or not), and when I simply didn't do any work and am willing to admit to myself that I wasted some time.

It's a simple tool, but it's effective. I hope to make it an even better tool in the future, and you'll know when because you're going to set it as your homepage too, and I'll post a small notice there when a new version is available.

Visit the page now: Get Back to Work.
Author: David Teten
#     Comments [0] | Trackback



 Wednesday, January 19, 2005
Economist.com | Meritocracy in America
The Economist writes on 'Meritocracy in America'. This is an accurate summary of the culture of just about every selective institution I've ever seen.
Author: David Teten
#     Comments [0] | Trackback



How to Stop The Tyranny of Email
I really enjoyed reading The Tyranny of Email. It has very practical advice on how to use email effectively.

There is one error in it; the author bases a small portion of the document on the widely repeated but in fact highly misleading observation that "38% of communication is inflection and tone of voice, 55% is facial expression, and only 7% is based on what you actually say". For background on why this is incorrect, see an urban legend: face-to-face communication is the best vehicle for communication.
Author: David Teten
#     Comments [0] | Trackback



 Tuesday, January 18, 2005
VentureWiki: Venture Capitalist's/Entrepreneur's Wiki
You may be interested in Venturewiki, which I believe just launched a few weeks ago. This is the first VC-focused use of a wiki that I've seen. The prolific Ross Mayfield of Socialtext is a contributor, among others.

Via Tony Christopher via Cynthia Typaldos via WebCommunities.
Author: David Teten
#     Comments [0] | Trackback



 Monday, January 17, 2005
Beginner's Guide to Business Blogging
The what, why, and how of business blogging, by business blog expert, DEBBIE WEIL. Normally $29, ChangeThis brings you the entire report for free until January 25th. I recommend this!

Beginner's Guide to Business Blogging
Author: David Teten
#     Comments [0] | Trackback



 Friday, January 14, 2005
You Have to Start Meeting Like This!
I really enjoyed reading this article on how to run fun, effective meetings.
Author: David Teten
#     Comments [0] | Trackback



Mapping the Culture of an Online Community
This paper from Patrick Lambe on "Mapping the Culture of an Online Community" is a great overview of the sort of characters that inhabit almost any online community (and many offline communities).

When reading it, I suggest ask yourself: which character are you, and which character do you aspire to be?


Via John Maloney on WebCommunities
Author: David Teten
#     Comments [0] | Trackback



 Thursday, January 13, 2005
Discussion with Leading Private Equity Journalists
Following are my notes from this morning's "59 Minutes" Panel:

MEET THE PRESS 2005: Discussion with Leading Private Equity Journalists
Sponsored by Broadgate Consultants, LLC

Moderated by Franci J. Blassberg, Co-Head of Debevoise & Plimpton’s Global Private Equity Team, Editor & Chief of the Debevoise & Plimpton Private Equity Report

Thursday, January 13, 2005, 8.30 AM – 9.29 AM
The Yale Club, New York City

Panelists:
Dane Hamilton, Reuters
Danielle Fugazy, Thomson
David Snow, Private Equity International
James Politi, Financial Times
David Carey, TheDeal
David Toll, Dow Jones

Politi: The only way to get information is to have sources/friends in the industry. Not as easy as public deals, where all the info is public.

Politi: Interest in private equity is much greater than it used to be
Toll: We pay a lot of attention to fundraising. "We have to rely on the age-old symbiosis between sources and journalists."

Blassberg: "How common are leaks? Where do they usually come from?"
Snow: "Leaks are epidemic, and the #1 source are GPs themselves." They say, "My lawyers won’t let me tell you I’m raising a $1B fund, but off the record, we’re about to raise a $1B fund."

Blassberg: "How do you know if a leak is accurate?"
Politi: "Always have two sources. Every leaker has a vested interest."
Carey: "Make sure you don’t traffic in rumor. We make sure they’re first-hand sources." Make sure the sources didn’t find out about the issue from just talking with one another. Make sure it’s not hurtful to someone.

Blassberg: "Most deals have confidentiality agreements. How do you feel about that, other than lucky?"
Hamilton: People talk to keep the relationship going.
Snow: An LP told me something, and I asked the GP about it. The GP told me to upbraid the LP for breaking confidentiality.
Hamilton: every reporter makes deals, e.g., for exclusivity.
Fugazy: exclusivity partly depends on a given publication’s publication schedule.
Politi: exclusives naturally get better placement.

Blassberg: "What makes a deal interesting?" Size, industry, other.
Toll: depends on how much detail is available. More detail makes for a better story. Human interest is important.
Hamilton: best stories have tension between contending forces. Bankruptcy court, auctions, hostile bids. "Anything involving Carl Icahn."
David Snow: Stories about market trends. E.g., about GP kicking out LP for disclosure.

Blassberg: Do you have a favorite LP?
Toll: They’re all our favorites.
The ones with a bone to pick are our favorites.

Blassberg: The ones who are unhappy talk more.
Snow: You get most of the information from just a few people.

Blassberg: What does "off the record" mean exactly?
Snow: I’ll let a major news institution answer that.
Hamilton: I'll tell people let's have a conversation for background. If there's something I want to use, I'll ask permission to use it.
Politi: Particularly in M&A/deal world, sources need comfort that they can talk.
Carey: As a courtesy, I check what people mean by 'off the record'.
Fugazy: we set the ground rules before a conversation.
Politi: firms have realized that they need to open up, because more attention is being paid to PE world.
Carey: I've been writing about PE deals since late 80s. Deals more fun then. Much newer business. Wesray never invested more than $5M in equity in any deal. "Market is much more efficient now—it's like cattle coming to market." Assembly-line quality. Much more staged, less drama.

Blassberg: Where is the drama? Who do you write stories for: insider in the industry, or outside reader?
Snow: depends on publication.
Politi: at FT, we're writing for a general audience. That's who we appeal to; we avoid "inside baseball".
Toll: Drama is cyclical. Lots of drama in 2002 with VCs. When we go to a recession, there will be lots of drama in the buyout business. Lots of small companies out there with high leverage on their books.
Snow: So you're long drama?

Blassberg: "Different PE firms have different levels of tolerance for talking with the press. What is a reasonable policy?"
Hamilton: Try to give reporters what they need, as much as possible. Worst: Don't give reporter the complete brush-off.
Carey: Be forthcoming. The ones who are selective about disclosure get the worst treatment. Biggest firms usually are the most professional. E.g., Carlyle. In his experience, they're very forthcoming. One of the most open organizations. KKR, Apollo, Blackstone. Smaller, mid-market firms often have policy of not communicating with press---probably force of habit. Also, some have poor habits.

Blassberg: Aren't you assuming that dialogue is good? PE firms take advantage of inefficiencies----why attract attention?
Carey: Last year, Clayton Dubilier Rice used our publication to discuss what's gone wrong and our plans to address it. That was an astute use of our paper to communicate.
Once at a reception, someone told me "We don't talk with the press"….and then literally turned his back and walked away.
Politi: if you get your message out when times are good, it will be much more transparent when times are bad.
Snow: PE firms are starting to care about brand.

Blassberg: What are big stories in 2005?
Snow: PE lawyers will do very well.
Hamilton: new kinds of exit strategies. New form of IDSs hitting the market?
Toll: Lot of institutional investors are trying to identify managers of the future. That motivates smart GPs to leave and set up their own shop.

Blassberg: New grads should go to PE again?
Toll: $84.7 billion raised for VC and buyout firms in the US in 2004. Next year 20-30% higher.
Politi: questions about access. Some firms are getting too ambitious about fundraising.
Toll: on buyout side, a lot of money going back to investors.
Snow: most secretive part of the business is secondary sales. Issues of ego. No one has an interest in publicizing a secondary sale.

Blassberg: Have numerous failures of IDSs, BDCs, tainted public's perception?
Toll: buyout firms just got greedy on fees. These deals might have gotten done if they were done on more reasonable terms.
Hamilton: Trend of high-dividend IPOs is interesting.
Carey: BDCs were marketed to retail. Used brand name even though they were often mezzanine vehicles not PE.

William Xin: likelihood of Asia deals in 05?
Toll: head of Carlyle said, "Shinsei was perhaps the greatest PE deal ever."

Audience member: Will trend of companies going private hurt your business, because of lesser disclosure?
Blassberg: often those deals are financed with public debt.
Snow: GPs are very careful about protecting progress of portfolio companies.

Politi: Kravis was very clear (at a recent conference) that hedge funds should stay out of PE business. We'll see if they obey.

Hedge funds are, however, a recruiting threat, because they have better economics. Take a carry without a preferred return. Don’t share deal fees with LPs.


Author: David Teten
#     Comments [0] | Trackback



 Wednesday, January 12, 2005
The CEO's Path to the Top: How Times Have Changed
The CEO's Path to the Top: How Times Have Changed
In a new study that compares Fortune 100 executives in 1980 with their counterparts in 2001, Peter Cappelli, director of Wharton's Center for Human Resources, and colleague Monika Hamori document what many CEOs and other senior managers have no doubt already witnessed: The road to the executive suite and the characteristics of the executives who get there have changed significantly over the last two decades. Among the researchers' findings: Today's executives are younger, more likely to be female, and less likely to have Ivy League educations. They get to the executive suite faster than ever, hold fewer jobs along the way, spend about five years less in their current organization before being promoted, and are more likely to be hired from the outside.

http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/1121.cfm
Author: David Teten
#     Comments [0] | Trackback



 Wednesday, January 05, 2005
Current and Future Leaders in Social Software
I had a busy week in Israel, but just arrived back in New York. You can download here my presentation to the MIT Enterprise Forum on Current and Future Leaders in Social Software. The Powerpoint includes a taxonomy of social software companies, lists of the major players in each sector of the social software industry, and examples of 12 different business models for blog companies (based on Scott Allen’s and my research). We would greatly appreciate your feedback on this!

Also, you can download here the slides from my talk to Tel Aviv University/Recanati Business School Alumni on "How to Quadruple Your Sales with Social Software".



Author: David Teten
#     Comments [0] | Trackback